Launch with more confidence and fewer blind spots
Protect your protocol and users with a structured security review that combines manual analysis, tooling, and remediation support before launch.
Limited availability. Audit slots are intentionally capped each month.
What you actually get
Every audit engagement includes clear deliverables, reporting, and follow-through.
Line-by-line review
Manual audit of trust assumptions, access control, accounting, upgradeability, and edge-case behavior.
Automated tooling
Static analysis, test review, and targeted checks that complement manual reasoning rather than replace it.
Launch-focused reporting
Every finding is severity-ranked, explained clearly, and tied to practical remediation guidance.
Post-audit support
Fix verification and direct clarification so issues get resolved instead of buried in a PDF.
Transparent pricing bands
Quotes still depend on complexity, but the engagement range should be clear from the start.
Small audit
Up to 500 SLOC
About 1 week
- Manual review and automated analysis
- Severity-ranked report and remediation notes
- Private findings delivery
- One fix verification pass included
Medium audit
500-1,500 SLOC
About 2 weeks
- Deeper business-logic review
- Architecture and trust-boundary analysis
- Severity-ranked report with exploit context
- Fix verification and launch-readiness follow-up
Large audit
1,500+ SLOC
3+ weeks
- Multi-contract and system-level review
- Extended collaboration across iterations
- Detailed reporting for stakeholders
- Support for phased releases and larger scopes
Process with clear milestones
A predictable workflow from scoping to final verification.
Scoping
1-2 daysReview documentation, repository structure, deployment targets, and business-critical assumptions.
Review
3-7 daysManual code analysis, automated checks, attack-path validation, and business-logic review.
Report
2-3 daysDraft findings, confirm context where needed, and deliver the report with remediation priorities.
Fixes
1-2 daysVerify changes, confirm resolved issues, and provide final sign-off notes before launch.
Built-in trust signals
Confidential by default
All findings are reported privately before any public disclosure.
Public proof available
Sample reports and portfolio evidence reduce credibility risk.
Launch-risk framing
The engagement is positioned around avoiding costly failures, not just checking code.
NDA-ready workflow
Teams can share sensitive code only after confidentiality is in place.
Frequently asked questions
How long does an audit usually take?
Most engagements take 1 to 3 weeks depending on SLOC, architecture complexity, and documentation quality. Small scopes can move faster; larger systems need more review time.
Do you sign NDAs?
Yes. Confidentiality is standard. I can sign your NDA before access is shared, or we can work under a mutual confidentiality agreement.
What happens after the report is delivered?
You get remediation guidance and one fix verification pass as part of the engagement. That keeps the audit tied to actual resolution, not just report delivery.
What chains do you audit?
Primary focus is EVM-compatible systems. Solana-related scopes can be discussed if the engagement matches expertise and timeline.
Can I review a sample report first?
Yes. Public reports are available in the portfolio and on GitHub so you can assess communication quality and depth before reaching out.
Don't let a preventable issue decide your launch
If the code is heading toward launch, fundraising, or a public release, an audit request should be the next step.